American visa law group

Guidance on New USCIS Adjustment of Status Memo

We publish vlog/blog posts with accompanying articles covering a variety of immigration topics. They are classified by the following subjects: News, General, Waivers, Family Based, U-Visa, VAWA, Asylum, EB1/NIW, PERM/I140, EB4, EB5, Visitors (B1/B2/VWP), E2, F1, H1B, L1, and TN Visas. Click on the title on any of the articles to read the full blog post:

USCIS’s new Adjustment of Status policy memo is already creating shockwaves across the immigration bar, and AILA has now released a detailed practice pointer confirming many attorneys’ concerns.

The May 22, 2026 USCIS Policy Memorandum reframes Adjustment of Status (“AOS”) as “extraordinary relief” rather than a routine immigration process. In practical terms, USCIS officers are now being instructed to more aggressively scrutinize whether applicants should be required to leave the United States and complete immigrant visa processing abroad instead.

And according to AILA, this is not theoretical anymore. USCIS officers are already issuing RFEs and asking applicants difficult discretionary questions during interviews.

What Changed?

Actual Questions to Expect at I-485 Interviews

AILA notes that for decades:

  • Congress repeatedly expanded AOS eligibility;
  • the courts recognized the importance of family unity and practicality;
  • and USCIS generally did not treat AOS as an “extraordinary” remedy.

The new memo changes the tone dramatically.

USCIS now states that Adjustment of Status is:

“extraordinary relief that permits applicants to dispense with the ordinary consular visa process.”

That language matters.

It signals that USCIS officers are now being encouraged to ask:

“Why should this person be allowed to adjust status inside the United States instead of leaving for consular processing?”

Even H-1B and L-1 Holders Are Not Fully Safe

One of the more alarming parts of the AILA practice pointer is the confirmation that dual intent status alone may no longer be enough.

The memo specifically notes that:

maintaining lawful status in a dual intent category is not sufficient on its own to warrant favorable discretion.

In other words:

  • simply being on H-1B,
  • paying taxes,
  • and maintaining lawful status

may no longer automatically insulate applicants from discretionary scrutiny.

That does not mean USCIS will deny all H-1B-based AOS cases. Far from it.

But it does mean officers may increasingly expect applicants to demonstrate positive discretionary factors beyond mere eligibility.

USCIS Is Already Issuing RFEs

Excerpt of an Actual RFE

AILA reports that USCIS officers are already:

  • issuing RFEs,
  • asking interview questions,
  • and probing applicants about why they did not pursue consular processing abroad.

Reported officer questions include:

  • Why did you apply for adjustment of status instead of consular processing?
  • What prevents you from pursuing immigrant visa processing abroad?
  • Why did you remain in the United States after your status expired?
  • What ties do you have in your home country?

This is a major operational shift.

What USCIS Considers “Negative” Factors

According to the memo and AILA’s analysis, officers are now instructed to weigh factors such as:

  • overstays;
  • status violations;
  • unauthorized employment;
  • conduct inconsistent with visa purpose;
  • fraud or misrepresentation;
  • and “preconceived intent.”

This last issue — preconceived intent — is especially important for:

  • B-1/B-2 visitors,
  • ESTA entrants,
  • F-1 students,
  • and other non-dual-intent categories.

Marriage shortly after entry, especially on a visitor visa, will likely receive increased scrutiny moving forward.

Positive Equities Matter More Than Ever

AILA emphasizes that the memo explicitly states:

the absence of negative factors alone is not enough.

Instead, USCIS is increasingly looking for affirmative positive equities such as:

  • strong family ties in the U.S.;
  • long-term lawful presence;
  • employment history;
  • tax compliance;
  • community involvement;
  • professional accomplishments;
  • specialized skills;
  • and evidence of economic benefit to the United States.

For applicants with overstays or status violations, the memo suggests USCIS may now expect “unusual or outstanding equities.”

A New Sliding Scale to Evaluate I-485 Eligibility

What Applicants Should Consider

AILA recommends that attorneys consider proactively documenting positive discretionary factors in many cases.

Depending on the case type and risk profile, this may include:

  • detailed declarations;
  • relationship timelines;
  • explanations of changed intent;
  • tax records;
  • employment evidence;
  • educational records;
  • community letters;
  • family hardship evidence;
  • and explanations for why AOS is more appropriate than consular processing.

Not every case requires a massive discretionary package. A clean long-term H-1B case is very different from a B-2 overstay case involving a quick marriage after entry.

But the days of assuming “if you’re eligible, you’re fine” may be ending.

Consular Processing Is Not Always a Simple Alternative

Some online commentators dismiss these concerns by saying:

“Just go do consular processing.”

But that oversimplifies reality.

Consular processing can involve:

  • lengthy separation from spouses and children;
  • uncertainty regarding unlawful presence bars;
  • lack of work authorization while abroad;
  • visa delays and administrative processing;
  • and the doctrine of consular nonreviewability, which severely limits judicial review if a visa is denied abroad.

AILA specifically notes that AOS provides significant procedural protections that consular processing does not.

AILA Suggests the Memo May Face Litigation

Interestingly, AILA strongly hints that the memo may eventually face legal challenges.

The practice pointer argues that USCIS:

  • relies on distinguishable case law,
  • ignores decades of Congressional expansion of AOS,
  • and overstates the relevance of certain Board of Immigration Appeals decisions.

AILA specifically references favorable cases such as:

which continue to support favorable discretion in many immediate-relative and equities-heavy cases.

Final Thoughts

This policy shift does not mean Adjustment of Status is dead.

But it does mean the environment has changed.

USCIS officers are now being instructed to scrutinize:

  • intent,
  • equities,
  • family circumstances,
  • immigration history,
  • and the rationale for pursuing AOS rather than consular processing.

Applicants — especially those with:

  • overstays,
  • status violations,
  • visitor visa entries,
  • or complicated timelines

should take these developments seriously and seek competent legal advice before filing.

The biggest mistake right now is complacency.

About the Author

Hasan Abdullah is the President and Managing Attorney of American Visa Law Group, PC, an immigration law firm based in the San Francisco Bay Area representing clients nationwide and internationally.

He has over 17 years of immigration law experience handling family-based immigration, employment visas, adjustment of status applications, waivers, extraordinary ability cases, PERM labor certifications, removal-related strategy, and complex discretionary matters before USCIS, the Department of State, and immigration courts.

Hasan regularly analyzes emerging immigration policy developments and their real-world impact on applicants, employers, students, families, and professionals navigating the U.S. immigration system.

American Visa Law Group focuses on strategic, detail-oriented representation in an increasingly complex immigration environment.

Schedule your consultation.
Take the first step towards resolving your legal matters with a personalized consultation.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Ready to take the next step?

Schedule your consultation today.